JST (JST)Price Live Chart, Prediction, Market Cap, Token Unlocks, JST Concept Stocks WalletJYS

BTC

$63,070.00

-0.36%

/JST Price

JST

No.76

$0.1041

+0.67%

≈$0.10

Market Cap

$917.65M

Cir. Cap

$917.65M

Cir. Supply

8.82B

Cir. Rate

100%

Total Supply

8.82B

Max Supply

9.9B

24h Volume

$214.09M

24h Vol (BTC)

22.26M

24h Turnover

2.425279%

Market Share

0.01%

Performance

Low

0.10

Range

+0.02%

High

0.10

Listing

$0.00

ATH (2020-05-09)

$0.2083

-50.01%

ATL (2021-04-05)

$0.004766

+2084.16%

Official

Contract

Tron: TCFLL5...mWZZy9

Official

Whitepaper

Social

Network

Converter

Chart

Market

About

Price

Cap

K-line

Depth

1 Minute

5 Minutes

15 Minutes

1 Hour

4 Hours

1 Day

TradingView

-0.08%

24H

+0.67%

+1.55%

30D

+18.43%

+198.71%

All

+5.05K%

AI Assistant

JST下跌原因

JST资金流向

JST买卖支撑位

JST多空比分析

JST趋势分析

Ask AI

JST Market

CEX Spot

CEX Derivatives

Pairs

#	Exchange	Pairs	Price	+2%Depth	-2%Depth	Volume (24h)
1	CoinEx	JSTUSDT	0.104066	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	1,978
2	Bybit	JSTUSDT	0.10386	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	5,618
3	Bitget	JSTUSDT	0.10407	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	10,840
4	gate.io	JSTUSDT	0.10367	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	11,867
5	KuCoin	JSTUSDT	0.10378	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	23,955
6	MEXC Global	JSTUSDT	0.10407	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	59,334
7	Bitunix	JSTUSDT	0.10408	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	96,406
8	WhiteBIT	JSTUSDT	0.104077	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	278,862
9	LBank	jstusdt	0.10403	--	--	643,153
10	Binance	JSTUSDT	0.10408	$10,244.76	$18,427.46	1,673,862

11 items

Rows

#	Unlock Date	Unlock Amount	Unlock Value	Total Supply %	Unlock Details
No Data

About JST

JUST (JST) is a cryptocurrency with market cap $0.7B, ranked #81. JUST (JST) is a cryptocurrency with market cap $0.7B, ranked #81.

81%

18%

Bullish

Bearish

Community

Mister Crypto

9m ago

🚨 The US bond market is issuing a major warning. The yield on the 30-year US Treasury note just hit 5.267%, a 19-year high. This move is no coincidence. The Federal Reserve kept interest rates unchanged this week, but three members voted against a rate hike. This is the largest number of members opposing a rate hike since September 2016. The market immediately adjusted its expectations for future trends. The probability of a September rate hike surged from 24% the previous day to 57%. Meanwhile, inflation has been above the Fed's 2% target for more than five consecutive years. Investors now expect higher returns to be willing to lend money to the US government for up to 30 years. This has led to a surge in long-term yields. This has far-reaching consequences. Rising yields will tighten financial conditions. Borrowing costs will rise. Equities will face greater pressure. Cryptocurrencies will face greater pressure. Meanwhile, funds have more attractive options in the bond market. For months, everyone has been waiting for interest rate cuts and easing liquidity. Now, the market has suddenly begun pricing in the exact opposite. The bond market is no longer pricing in rate cuts. Instead, it's pricing in rate hikes. Risk assets need to be closely watched.

454

Michael Saylor

25m ago

This could be one of the worst weeks in Bitcoin history. Many people thought they did almost everything right. They bought reputable hardware wallets, generated mnemonic phrases offline, followed established best practices, yet still lost significant amounts of Bitcoin due to a vulnerability affecting mnemonic phrases generated in March 2021 and later for @COLDCARDwallet. This vulnerability remained undetected for over five years. I believe this will permanently change people's confidence in self-custody of Bitcoin. Over the years, I've tried many different hardware wallets. Intuitively, I've never trusted any wallet to the point of storing large amounts of Bitcoin. These are small devices from startups, costing only $200, yet people use them to protect life-changing fortunes. Most users never audit the code. I've never conducted a sufficiently thorough code audit either. I lack the time and technical expertise to independently verify every component of the device, the firmware, entropy generation, and the supply chain. Furthermore, there are numerous potential points of failure. The software may contain unintended bugs. Insiders may have intentionally introduced vulnerabilities. The vendor could compromise components of the device. Firmware updates could also cause problems. The random number generator could malfunction, and almost no one would notice. Everyone who buys the device indicates they might eventually store a large amount of wealth on it. This makes the entire hardware and software supply chain an extremely attractive target. This situation always seems inevitable. I've always believed that attempting to self-store a large amount of Bitcoin requires multi-vendor multi-signature, with keys generated independently using different hardware and software. The keys should also be stored in different physical locations. Even if one device is completely compromised, it shouldn't result in the loss of all your Bitcoin. Even with this architecture, I've always felt somewhat uncertain. I've also held large amounts of MSTR, ASST, GBTC, and IBIT. Self-preservation is a powerful tool, but its risks are clearly far greater than many people realize. I believe the self-preservation model will continue to exist, but it has undergone a permanent change. Currently, the wave of Bitcoin adoption is primarily driven by ETFs, Treasury companies, and institutional custodians. This comes mainly from those who are not interested in expertise in areas such as private key generation, hardware security, firmware, backups, estate planning, and physical storage. This is entirely understandable. Securing one's own keys is so complex that even the experts who manufacture these devices failed to prevent this vulnerability, and the broader technical community failed to discover it for over five years. The free market naturally fosters specialization. Bitcoin remains an extremely valuable tool. Most people lacking deep expertise in securely generating and protecting private keys will outsource this responsibility to individuals and institutions specializing in this area. For users who want direct control of large amounts of Bitcoin, multi-vendor multisig should be standard practice. If you are concerned about this, you can choose institutional-grade custody services. Protecting large amounts of Bitcoin with only a single key generated by a single hardware wallet leads to an excessive concentration of risk. I believe this is the direction Bitcoin custody is heading. The obvious concern is that institutional custody could ultimately lead to an excessive concentration of Bitcoin in the hands of large companies. This would bring the risks of censorship, seizure, and confiscation. However, Bitcoin's portability and settlement characteristics provide a crucial check and balance. Anyone can create a wallet and request that Bitcoin be sent to them. Settlements can be completed quickly worldwide. And it's inexpensive. In just minutes, people can go from counterparty risk exposure to direct ownership of assets. Gold has never possessed this characteristic. Most people don't hold physical gold. Their gold is stored in a vault. You can't quickly ship gold from New York to Tokyo. You can't easily demand immediate global settlement and obtain assets you can personally verify and hold. Gold's lack of portability and inability to quickly demand physical settlement ultimately led to its failure as a currency. Bitcoin solves this problem. You can leave a custodian, acquire real Bitcoin, create a wallet, demand settlement, and move your wealth into cold storage. You always have the ability to eliminate counterparty risk. This choice is crucial. Bitcoin empowers everyone to control their own wealth. It empowers everyone to break free from custodians. It empowers everyone to demand final settlement and obtain assets under their personal control. This ability to control private keys is key to ensuring the accountability of custodians, governments, and financial institutions. This is one of the fundamental properties of how Bitcoin works. I think we might consider this moment one of the darkest periods in Bitcoin's history. The loss of Bitcoin has shaken confidence. Many who were once steadfast believers in Bitcoin are now forced to re-examine the assumptions they once took for granted. If this marks a turning point, I wouldn't be particularly surprised. As long as Bitcoin itself remains secure, the failure of a custody mechanism doesn't render the underlying monetary system ineffective. It only forces the market to develop better tools and stricter standards.

355

☠️RISINGONE☠️🔱

32m ago

South Korean Stock Market Loses a Year's GDP in 38 Days South Korean stock market experienced a "Crazy Friday": KOSPI surged 17.91%, SK Hynix hit its daily limit! South Korean investors finally got a breather. July 31: 📈 KOSPI index surged 17.91% in a single day, marking its largest single-day gain. 🚀 SK Hynix hit its daily limit, rising 30% in a single day. But just days before, countless retail investors were experiencing a "stock market crash." On July 29, KOSPI plummeted 8.15%, triggering the 9th market-wide circuit breaker this year. Some highly leveraged investors didn't even get to see a rebound. A 29-year-old South Korean automotive software engineer revealed: His company's deputy manager was just one step away from retirement, but due to a stock market crash, his entire fortune was wiped out. Just a few months ago, he had earned 400 million won (approximately 1.88 million RMB) through stock trading. As of July 30: The KOSPI has fallen 38.63% from its June 22 high; The South Korean stock market has lost approximately 2877 trillion won (about 13.5 trillion yuan) in market capitalization. One day in heaven, the next in hell. The biggest risk in the stock market is often not the decline itself, but the leverage that prevents you from waiting for a rebound.

346

The Bitcoin Historian

58m ago

Breaking News: Coinbase, with a market capitalization of $60 billion, has just confirmed that the Bitcoin Transparency Act is finally ready and about to pass. "We have a substantive bill with bipartisan support." "We have finalized the ethics code." "Everything is ready." A full vote with bipartisan support is imminent. Go for it! 🚀🚀

396

Crypto Engineers

1h ago

When he made a 439% profit in the first half of the year, he was called a prophet. Today, with his fund forcibly liquidated, he's called a gambler. The same person, the same portfolio, only thirty days in between. @leopoldasch, 25 years old, with a team of 8, started with $225 million in 2024 and grew it to $45 billion in two years. The Stripe brothers, Nat Friedman, and Jane Street were all his limited partners (LPs). On July 24th, he was still writing to investors, saying this correction was the most attractive opportunity since 2025, and that the subscription window would open on August 1st, welcoming additional investment. Six days after sending the letter, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America all called to claim additional funds. Citadel bought his entire public equity book for a fixed price. The fund's size dropped from $45 billion to $10 billion. The interesting part is this—his fund was called Situational Awareness. His understanding of the entire AI industry was so precise it was documented in a 165-page paper, copied worldwide, yet he remained oblivious to the margin in his own account. Even more interesting is the specific bet he won. His open market positions—Bloom Energy, SanDisk, CoreWeave, SK Hynix, Nebius, plus $8.4 billion in notional chip put options—were all wiped out. Only one remained: Anthropic, bought in February 2025 at a valuation of $60 billion, now valued at $965 billion, worth approximately $5 billion. Do you understand? Assets priced every minute killed him; the one unpriced asset saved him. It wasn't because his assessment of Anthropic was more accurate; it was because that particular asset couldn't be sold, couldn't be pledged, and wasn't subject to daily mark-to-market, so the prime broker couldn't force him to liquidate. All his meticulously constructed long-short hedging, option protection, and leverage structures failed in the face of liquidity; the only thing that survived was that asset he couldn't touch. By the way, his fiancée is the chief of staff for the Anthropic CEO. This position is probably the least like a trade in the entire event. As for "Wall Street's Old Deng precisely hunting AI Little Deng"—don't even imagine it. In 2006, Amaranth natural gas exploded, and Citadel took over. On July 30, 2007, exactly 19 years ago on the same day, Sowood's net worth halved, and Citadel took over. Today, July 30, Citadel took over again. The same script has been played out for twenty years. No one is hunting you down. When you use 4x leverage and your position is so large it can't be hidden, others don't need to do anything; they just need to wait until you have to sell. The truly miserable one isn't him. He still has $5 billion in Anthropic, a unicorn about to IPO, and is 25 years old. The miserable ones are those who copied the 13F filing. 13F is a 45-day delayed snapshot; it doesn't show short selling, overseas positions, or leverage. You think you're trading with a guru, but you're copying his work from two months ago, and only half of it—he was long on AI infrastructure while holding $8.4 billion in notional put options on Nvidia and SMH. You not only can't copy this, but you're also trading nakedly in the opposite direction. He was liquidated, left with $5 billion. Those who copied him were liquidated, left with only Alipay bills. The key to identification in one sentence: At any time, what you see is only a snapshot of someone else's positions; what you don't see is their leverage, hedging, and exit strategies. The former is public; the latter is the whole picture. Industry judgments can be correct for years, but accounts can't survive three weeks. He bet on the AI bottleneck shifting to physical infrastructure—a judgment I still believe is correct today. He didn't lose on the direction; he used 4x leverage to bet on a supply-demand mismatch window. Being on the right direction and surviving are two completely unrelated things.

422

kvc.eth @AI CryptoGame

2h ago

Stay away from the crypto world; someone tried to run off with $20 million in assets. What's that in the AI world...? The truth is out. There's nothing left to do. Just go back to Web2, make some games, AI, short dramas. $100,000 a day, isn't that great?

377

The Bitcoin Historian

3h ago

GIANT EXCHANGE COINBASE JUST RELEASED A POWERFUL AD ABOUT WHY WE #BITCOIN "EVERY DAY THE FED PRINTS $465 MILLION" "26,000 SHIPPING CONTAINERS A YEAR CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR" "THERE’S ONE THING THEY CAN NEVER PRINT MORE OF… BITCOIN" THERE WILL ONLY EVER BE 21 MILLION BTC THE US NATIONAL DEBT IS NOW NEARING $40 TRILLION OPT OUT 🚀🚀

397

Titan

3h ago

#Bitcoin Since the start of this bear market, the monthly fair value gap has eased before price pullbacks. A new monthly fair value gap has just appeared. I expect the same pattern to continue: at least until price pulls back or the gap is broken completely.

438

The Bitcoin Historian

3h ago

The former president of PayPal just stated that the "Clarity Act on Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies" must be passed immediately; this is crucial. "We need clear rules for the United States." "We need to continue leading the global financial system." He believes that once the bill becomes law, all U.S. banks will quickly adopt it. The Clarity Act must pass this week! 🔥

441

0xSiyuan

3h ago

Many are still debating whether AI will replace humans, but what will truly determine the landscape of the next few decades may not be AI, but a form of energy. It's called: controlled nuclear fusion. Many people don't know that humanity has actually mastered nuclear fusion long ago. The hydrogen bomb is nuclear fusion. But the hydrogen bomb solved the problem of: How to use the power of the sun to destroy a city in 0.1 seconds. Controlled nuclear fusion, on the other hand, solves the problem of: How to confine a "mini-sun" inside a box and make it generate electricity stably every day. These two challenges are on completely different levels. Many people now ridicule nuclear fusion: "It's been researched for over 70 years and hasn't been commercialized yet; is it a scam?" But look at it from another perspective: 70 years ago, humanity didn't even have computers. Today, the computing power of a single mobile phone surpasses that of an entire country's supercomputer decades ago. The same applies to energy. The technology that truly changes the level of civilization is never a simple invention, but rather making it cheap enough. Oil didn't change the world because it was discovered, but because it was cheaply extracted. Transistors didn't change the world because they could be manufactured, but because they were manufactured on a large scale. The same is true for AI. If controlled nuclear fusion is successfully achieved in the future, the first thing to be changed might not be ordinary people's electricity bills. It would be the entire world's production logic. Why is AI developing so rapidly now? Because of computing power. Why is the competition for computing power becoming increasingly fierce? Because of electricity. The biggest AI companies of the future may not be those with the most powerful models, but rather those that possess the most cheap energy. You think the AI competition is a war between OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic? Actually, it might be a war of: Energy war. Some say: "Solar and wind power are enough, why do we need nuclear fusion?" The problem is, the energy needs of humanity in the future may far exceed those of today. AI data centers. Robot manufacturing. New energy vehicles. Seawater desalination. Space exploration. All these resources combined would require dozens of times more energy than today. Current human civilization is essentially built on: coal, oil, and natural gas. We've been burning the ancient sun for hundreds of years. Nuclear fusion, in essence, is an attempt to: create our own sun. If one day, a country or company is the first to master commercial nuclear fusion, it won't just be an energy company. it will be a trump card for the future world. Because once energy becomes cheap enough: AI computing power will be cheap. Industrial costs will decrease. Freshwater will become cheap. Manufacturing will be reshaped. It could even change the competitive landscape of nations. Every energy revolution in history has given rise to a new hegemon. The coal era made Britain powerful. The oil era made the United States powerful. So? Who will benefit from the fusion era? Of course, we are still a long way from true commercialization. But one thing is certain: For the past 100 years, humanity has been solving the problem of "how to obtain more information." For the next 100 years, humanity may need to solve the problem of: how to obtain near-infinite energy. Because when energy is no longer scarce, many things that seem crazy today may become commonplace. What truly changes the world is never a particular product. It is the redefinition of underlying resources.

341