web3: Why is the value of Bitcoin Treasury shares higher than the value of the coins held?
Coinpaper
35m ago
Ai Focus
Foreign media articles analyze the discrepancy between the valuation of Bitcoin treasury companies and the value of their held coins, with a focus on the financing expansion, debt burden, and coin selling frameworks of Strategy.
Helpful
No.Help

Foreign media: Bitcoin treasury companies do not necessarily trade based on the value of their holdings of BTC. The article points out that the premium or discount given by the market depends more on how the company uses its capital structure, rather than just the current price of Bitcoin.

Strategy has become a typical example.

Strategy is the most well-known company in this industry. According to the article, the company raised $25.3 billion in financing in 2025, becoming the largest stock issuer in the United States that year, while also continuing to increase its holdings of Bitcoin. By July 2026, its holdings had exceeded 843,000 BTC, and during that year, it raised an additional $17.06 billion through a market-price issuance plan.

Why does the premium fall back?

The article suggests that the premium of such stocks may fall even faster than Bitcoin itself. The reason is that investors will re-evaluate the financing capabilities, market sentiment, and whether the companies can continue to increase their holdings. Once the capital market weakens, the valuation gap could narrow rapidly.

Discount does not equal cheapness.

The article also mentions that debt, preferred stock obligations, and high dividend payments can all depress valuations. The market may also take into account in advance potential future dilutions, debt repayments, tax burdens, operating costs, and even the possibility of the company selling Bitcoin in the future. The introduction of a framework in 2026 that allows for the sale of Bitcoin to support reserves, interest payments, and preferred stock dividends indicates that the treasury assets are not completely locked in. Strategy

Additional information:The article emphasizes that buying BTC is not the same as buying Bitcoin treasury shares. The former involves directly holding assets, while the latter also comes with additional variables such as management, financing, dilution, and debt.

Tip
$0
Like
0
Save
0
Views 10
WalletJYS reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
Revolut Confirms Exposure of Customer Information Due to Fake Government Requests
Revolut Confirms that some customer data was leaked due to forged government requests, stating that customer funds and internal systems were not affected.
TechCrunch
·2026-09-12 22:55:06
9
web3 : Revolut Suspected leakage of users' Bitcoin records and personal information
ZachXBT claims that Revolut may have mistakenly believed a forged government request and leaked some users' identity information, bank details, and Bitcoin transaction records.
The Cryptonomist
·2026-09-12 22:35:43
12
web3: The mainnet of Arc under Circle will be launched, with BlackRock and Visa serving as validators.
Circle will launch on the public mainnet on September 16th, Arc. The first batch of validators includes BlackRock, Visa, MasterCard, and DTCC. The network focuses on USDC payments and tokenized assets.
Coinpaper
·2026-09-12 22:35:43
11
web3: Teucrium goes short on XRP ETF; the extension is postponed again
Teucrium Double Short Selling; XRP ETF Effective Date Postponed to October 11, with the Scale of Long Products Exceeding 150 Million US Dollars
Coinpaper
·2026-09-12 21:30:23
19
View More